![]()
![]()
Intellectual Property
Intellectual Property Rights in India
India has seen a remarkable turnaround from its once protective policy towards its domestic industries with minimal intellectual property protection to encourage a copying culture of cheap goods to a wide acceptance of foreign companies and strict intellectual proper rights. For example, in 1977, intellectual property law so favored Indian industries, it required that Coca-Cola disclose its recipe. Rather than reveal its recipe, Coca-Cola left India instead. Local colas such as Thums Up and Campa Cola sprang up to take its place. But in 1993, Coca-Cola and Pepsi were back in India and drove Thums Up and Campa Cola out of the market, buying their factories in the process.
Nehruvian Socialism
Since its independence in 1947 until 1991, India adopted a policy similar to one implemented by Japan in which trade with outside countries was minimized in an attempt to achieve self-sufficiency. This strategy was known as Nehruvian Socialism. It promoted and protected Indian industries, in particular, those companies that were trying to replace foreign imports. For example, in 1977, a socialist Indian government changed investment rules to protect Indian industries, which drove IBM out of the country.
During the period of Nehruvian Socialism, trade tariffs were kept high to erect a barrier against foreign imports. Expensive import licenses turned away many foreign companies and protected domestic producers. While well intentioned, this barrier kept some needed industrial parts India could not produce out of India. Further, without imports, other countries refused to accept Indian exports leading to the dramatic decline of Indian world trade on the world market.
At the same time, the state was intervening in many sectors to stimulate industries yet still provide basic services to the people. The Indian government during this time tried to keep as many people employed as possible through large public projects. As trade unions developed through these public works, workers became resistant to improvements in productivity since that meant the loss of jobs. The government was also trying to stimulate agriculture yet provide cheap food to the public. In the end, the public won out as the government set the price much lower than the market would bear. To help out the farmers, the government had to subsidize the cost of grain production. This policy, combined with needed foreign industrial parts being kept out of India made business in efficient. The public expenditures also made the government lose money.
In the 1970s, the Indian government took a renewed effort to remove foreign companies from India. In 1970, it introduced the Indian Patent Act of 1970. This Act recognized process patents but not product patents. In particular, the following were not patentable according to Chapter II of the Patent Act of 1970:
These social policies combined with the isolationist policy caused other countries to withdraw foreign aid and drove the government closer and closer towards debt. At this point, India’s tiny trade on the world market came back to haunt it since India could not use the world market to produce profit to support its economy. In the 1980s, India began borrowing from the World Bank to support its economy; however, this was not enough to sustain its expenses in social projects. Everything came to a climax following the Gulf War in 1991 as the Indian economy was on the verge of bankruptcy. The crisis was resolved by $2.3 billion from the IMF, but it became apparent Indian needed to change its policy to survive.
Thus, in July 1991, the government adopted a policy of radical liberalization that was designed to encourage foreign investments and reduce its trade deficit brought about by years of isolation. The import licenses were removed and foreign companies were now allowed to own 51% stakes in Indian companies. Intellectual property rights were seen as another method to lure foreign investment to India.